- This topic has 6 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
hi
in my network optimizer set the
HO DL AVERAGING WINDOW FOR LEVEL=6
and HO DL AVERAGING WINDOW FOR QUALITY=3i want o know what is the reason of set different averaging window size for level & quality.
the same values of averaging window size set for uplink ho.
hi
it is usual to detect quality variation quicker than level variation. So that Quality HO are triggered earlier.
Now “3” seems a little too fast, but it really depends on your network (urban + SFH 1×1 ? in this case 3 could work)
regards
pixhi pix
thanx for your reply
yes,it is urban and SFH 1×1but i dont understand what is relation between AVERAGING WINDOW SIZE for quality and frequency hopping SFH 1×1??
meantime i think from the perception view it is better that network quickly trigger a Quality HO instead of level HO.is’nt it??
Hi,
Wow, I’m good ! you give me just one parameter setting, and I can describe your network topology 😀
The thing is that urban area = high traffic
SFH 1×1 = very sensitive to high traffic (more traffic = more frequencies are used at the same time = more interference)therefore, if you want to protect your network quality, you must quickly detect any quality degradation.
As soon as a quality degrades, then the Ho should be triggered, in order to locate the MS into a new cell.Doing this will minimize the amount of MS generating interferences, in your “sensitive” network.
Reducing the Avg Qual window detects a quality degradation quicker.
Therefore, the HO is triggered quiker than before, yes.regards
pixthanx a lot pix
i need to know your birthday.
i have one surprise for you!!jack, that’s a strange request…
let’s say my birthday is today then !hi pix
i am sorry for delay in answer
i really thanx to you
- The forum ‘Telecom Design’ is closed to new topics and replies.
