- This topic has 35 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 10 months ago by JAMIL.
-
AuthorPosts
-
19th June 2007 at 10:10 #47847DlonyerGuest
Hello Everybody,
Hope you can help me.
I have 2 sites with an alarm of“BTS Operation Degraded, RX Level Differ to Much Between Main & Diversity Antenna”
-Considering it is an inbuilding solution we don’t use divesity. Check the hardware of the ultrasite & it is defined without diversity. Confirm with BSC & they defined it w/o divesity.Check also the VSWR of the cables are ok(line to line & system test)
Still i have my existing alarm. Hoping that you can help me resolve this problem.
20th June 2007 at 07:04 #47848Rachmat TriongkoGuestI am a telecommunication engineer, I have alarm 7745 channel failure rate on Nokia BTS Ultra site High capacity configuration 666, i did electrical and mechanical tilting and azimuth matching with RNP, i did change DVDC,TRX and BB2F untill now alarm still appear…anyone to help me…..????
21st June 2007 at 10:23 #47849DiamondGuestHi All
Does anybody know what means “The reflected power of remote tune combiner is too high.” in Nokia Ultrasite BTS and what to do???
This Alarm appeared to trx’s and sector one.21st June 2007 at 18:07 #47850patrick.frGuestDlonyer – 19 Jun 2007
“BTS Operation Degraded, RX Level Differ to Much Between Main & Diversity Antenna”
during commisionning, ultrasite check antenna and calculate VSWR.
Start again commisionng with real antenna connected. Your alarm must cancel and come back never again. (i hope) 😉
you can see VSWR with ultrasite manager => rssi comparaison value menu.
21st June 2007 at 18:13 #47851patrick.frGuestRachmat Triongko – 20 Jun 2007
7745 channel failure rate
cancel this alarm with ZEOR:BCF:ALARM;
If it come back again look end number under RATE.
100d or 50d or 60d or …. It is a decimal number which means percent.
If you have 100d = 100% failureThen change TRX, copler, bad ross, LNA, feeder, cable, … check every element of radio.
If it is not element of your BTS ultrasite, change frequency (BCCH).(bad frequency plan, it is possible)
21st June 2007 at 18:21 #47852patrick.frGuestDiamond – 21 Jun 2007
I have never seen this alarm but i give you NED solution:
The reflected power of remote tune combiner is too high.
Description
Object affected: TRXObject state: Disabled
Units affected: BB2x, DVxx, RTxx, TSxx, MNxx
Instructions
Check the antenna connection to the remote tune combiner.If the antenna connection is OK, replace the remote tune combiner connected to the alarming TRX.
Cancelling
Automatic5th August 2009 at 14:20 #47853TilterGuestHi,
Regarding 7745, some of the alarms are resolved during the SW upgrade of the BSC, because BSC dictates The standard mean holding time of the BTS, the new SW (5.1 or above) might done something in the defined treshold (wether it is automatically retuned by the SW or not, only Nokia experts know),but if the 7745 is not resolved thru SW upgradem it means that the mean holding time for that BTS really exceeds or much lower(not frequent,7743) than the defined treshold,it only means one thing, the sampling rate for downlink path is so high,probable cause is oveshooting or try to decrease the RXP for a while then check the result,SWR issues,faulty duplexer or combiner(for Transmit/downlink),just give it a try.
For
“BTS Operation Degraded, RX Level Differ to Much Between Main & Diversity Antenna”, have you try to configure the diversity connectors in HW configurator?Nokia HW configurator has a bug in which it retains the connectivity of the DIV RX in the BCF’s memory, just try to check,perform a recommisioning and then check it out again to make sure, it should eliminate the problem,altho the alarm is not that traffic affecting, it just measures RX levels continuously between DIV RX and RX,so that means the BCF still detects a connection in the Duplexer port(going to the multicoupler), hoep that helps even a little, pls dont hesitate to reply if there is any correction, thanksanyone of you remembers the treshold for RSSI that is measured by BTS Ultrasite manager?
Regards
19th August 2009 at 06:31 #47854RINKU DHIMANGuestI WANT ABOUT ULTRA SITE NOKIA RSSI COMPARISION VALUE ( DIFFERENCE and REL.DEFFERENCE.WHAT EFFECT OCCURE IN BTS OR SECTOR WITH HIGH DIFF.OR REL.DIFF. PLS TEL ME IN BRIEF
6th September 2009 at 07:39 #47855HayderGuestDear Pls I asked about the effect of Hi VSWR value in CDMA networks
2nd February 2010 at 03:37 #47856YARMATGuestHI DEARS,
I HAVE THE SAME ALARM “BTS OPERATION DEGRADED RX LEVEL DIFFER TOO MUCH BETWEEN MAIN AND DIVERSITY ANTENNA”ON TWO SITES..I HAVE CHECK THE HARDWARE CONFIGRATOR THAT IS OK,CABLING IS DEFINE PROPERLY. I HAVE CHECKED THE INDOOR JUMPERS, I HAVE REPLACE DUPLEXER,TRX, I HAVE CHECK THE FEEDERS CONNECTORS, I HAVE TROUBLESHOOT MY LEVEL BEST COMMISION THE SITE TWICE BUT STILL I HAVE THE ALRM ON SITE. MHA HAS ALSO BEEN USED WITH RF ANTENNAS,I HOPE THAT U WLL HELP ME IN RESOLVING THIS PROBLEM.3rd February 2010 at 18:55 #47857tilterGuestHi,
pls. try to replace the DIV RX and RX cables going to TRX, if not, try to replace all the cables, including the main RX DIV and RX going to the Combiner(just to be sure), sometimes the connector suffers from rusting due to moisture, the measurement is gathered mainly after the Multicoupler, then sends the measurement to BCF via M6HA or M2LA,since the coupler is just a passive device, hope this helps, pls dont hesitate to post a reply for some corrections, so that we can learn a lot 🙂
4th February 2010 at 15:33 #47858YARMATGuestthanks tilter for ur reply i wl do it if it wl resolve the issue or not..i have a doubt to bypass the MHA But before i wl try this mathod hope it wl give some help. once a gain thanks
23rd February 2010 at 14:16 #47859praveenGuestHi Patrick
thanx 4 ur solution regarding….
7745 channel failure rate 🙂
br//pk
5th May 2010 at 11:59 #47860R.RajkumarGuestI am a telecommunication engineer, I have alarm 7745 channel failure rate on Nokia BTS Ultra site High capacity configuration 666, i did electrical and mechanical tilting and azimuth matching with RNP, i did change DVDC,TRX and BB2F untill now alarm still appear…anyone to help me…..????
7th May 2010 at 02:14 #47861AnshuGuestCheck the connector may b due to moisture it is damage if not Change the cable or measure the VSWR……
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Telecom Design’ is closed to new topics and replies.