- This topic has 15 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 12 years, 4 months ago by manmayur.
-
AuthorPosts
-
3rd August 2010 at 18:05 #63930Saurabh SinghGuest
In my bSC SOME Stand alon Site Having
Low TASR/RxQual
Please help to Improve this
suggest any parameter.8th August 2010 at 04:57 #63931LexGuestHave you checked the reason for poor RX qual?
9th August 2010 at 06:03 #63932ManiaGuesttry finding which TRX is having bad quality BCCH, GSM hopping or DCS and then investigate for frequency clashes, Wrong inner zone settings, wrong MAL / MAIO settings, faulty Radio/ Issue with Path balance etc.
13th August 2010 at 08:46 #63933Saurabh SinghGuestTnaks for the help Mania
18th August 2010 at 19:03 #63934anshuGuestCan any one tell me cascading is also reason for Poor TASR.
26th August 2010 at 07:04 #63935Saurabh SinghGuestHi Mania,
Please help me again
here some cells are coming of ageing 2-3 days in TASR& TCR.
Then Its automatically disappear in bad KPI.30th August 2010 at 04:06 #63936ManiaGuestHi Saurabh,
Could you please explain, I am not familier with the terms TASR& TCR..
I can assume TASR to be TCH_Assign_Success_Rate but no idea of TCR. Also which vendor are you working on.30th August 2010 at 05:00 #63937Saurabh SinghGuestTCR – TCH Comp rate
I am working for Huawei.30th August 2010 at 07:05 #63938BijoyGuestTCR=100-TCH Drop Rate
30th August 2010 at 07:10 #63939Saurabh SinghGuestYes
1st September 2010 at 05:24 #63940ManiaGuestWell not familiar with Huawei I think you should start with the usual checking. if the cells are of the same cluster check if IOI is on the increase with same trend. Check if the whole BSC gets effected then it might be some hardware level issue. however if these are random cells at random locations then analyse individually as mentioned below.
As to which TRX / set of hardware gets degraded for each site when the degradation occurs. Also it might be environmental issue so check if any specific band gets degraded. check if distance drops increase or RACH failures increase with the same trend.13th September 2010 at 13:05 #63941Saurabh SinghGuestWhat the reason for delay handovers?
While attempting the handover Rxqual and Rx level degraded?why?1st June 2012 at 04:53 #63942sandyGuestany one can help me to explain rach failure
3rd June 2012 at 06:44 #63943pixGuesthi,
rach failure could be due to two main reasons:
1) the channel request contains an invalid “cause” field.
2) the timing advance is greater than the max timing advance allowed (“rach ta filter” or “max ta”)Reason 2 is quite straightforward. Maximum TA possible is 63, but it can be reduced by operator.
Reason 1 : mostly due to electromagnetic noise which sounds like a near-perfect channel request. Except the field “cause” contains an invalid value.
-> possibly HO ACCESS aimed at another cell (TCH, BSIC) where TCH(n)=BCCH(s) and BSIC(n)=BSIC(s).
-> possibly self-generated noise from the BTS itself
-> a crazy MS
-> an external device that sends bursts of signal, which actually sounds like a ch. req. (i think we’ve seen an army radar which was doing this, on this forum, a while ago)regrds
pix13th September 2012 at 10:42 #63944guruGuestCascading will have impact on TASR….iF you configure more than 12 trx in a single E1 ,you are going to get issues.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Telecom Design’ is closed to new topics and replies.